Thursday, 28 February 2013

Davis and Shirtliff unveils uninterruptible power back up systems



By Eric Akasa

 Energy equipment supplier Davis and Shirtliff is offering a electricity backup system that provides a completely seamless transition between grid supply, battery backup and generator operation: as a complete protection against endemic power interruptions.
Electricity is the fourth biggest business constraint after tax rates, access to finance, and informal sector practices, according to the World Bank, with up to 12 per cent of Kenyan businesses blaming frequent electricity interruptions for low productivity.
On average, businesses experience 7 blackouts every month, some lasting up to 12 hours. In one incident last year, a number of companies ten kilometres outside Nairobi incurred some Sh20 million in losses due to power outages, which lasted for three consecutive days, forcing them to use stand-by generators that are prohibitively expensive to run, reported sabahionline.com.
Orata International Ltd., an animal-feed manufacturing company based in Nairobi's industrial area, said it lost more than Sh3million($36,000) in just March and April last year due to blackouts.
“Even where there's a generator, for some businesses, the data loss due to computers going off during certain tasks can take a team back by months,” said Mr. David Gatende, Deputy CEO at Davis and Shirtliff Group.
However, the power back up supply system promises to end such damage.
“Its a flexible system that gives priority to either generator or inverter system, depending on clients' needs,” said Mr. Gatende.
The system ensures that when power goes off there is no interruption to ongoing work and computers remain on, as the inverter takes over supply for up to 7 hours, after which the generator comes on, powering the premises as it also recharges the inverter.
Companies running sensitive businesses that rely on a continuous flow of power are now using the power system with impressive results. Onfone Media is one such company. The company specializes in SMS solutions and computer system design, licensed by CCK, and serves banks, radio stations and government institutions across East Africa.
“Our systems are supposed to run 24hrs a day. Whenever there is a blackout, it is not only our business that is affected, but those of our clients, making it imperative to have a reliable back up system,” said Mr. Francis Mulunda of Onfone Media.
At present, many companies use generators as their sole power back up, many generators however are significantly louder producing sounds of around 85 decibels unlike the Cooper Eco-pack generators that run at an average 70 decibels, producing sound equivalent to an average conversation.
“We offer a wide range of generators for various needs, the Cooper generator for instance is incorporated for clients who prioritize silence in their backup system, and they are also very fuel efficient ” added Mr. Gatende.

Davis and Shirtliff is the sole distributor of Cooper Ecopack generators in Kenya. Cooper Ecopack generators are available in 3 sizes: 15, 20 and 30 kVA. The sets also feature electronic operational diagnosis where they are connected to a computer to analyse defects and optimise operation thus improving reliability and minimising operation costs. Support can be provided in the form part of a yearly service contract which offers a maximum response time of 24 hours.
The multinational is a major player in the market for power products, offering inverter/battery backup solutions from 350 W to 11,000W and generators from portable 0.5 kVA units to large stationary generators with outputs up to 375 kVA.

Kenyan developers listed in Forbes



By Eric Akasa

Two Kenyan youths in the real estate sector have been named in the top 30 African entrepreneurs under the age of 30 who are making the most dramatic impact across Africa in the prestigious Forbes annual listing of the 30 under 30 innovators and entrepreneurs.

The two, Ian Kahara and Kimiti Wanjaria both 29, were listed among six other Kenyans cut across Real Estate, Financial Services, Manufacturing, Media, Tech, Green tech, Healthcare, Agriculture and Fashion who are helping the country alleviate common problems like unemployment, health care, electricity shortages, poor housing and poor waste management.

Last year, the duo made headlines as a breed of young vanguard entrepreneurs who beat all financial odds to bet their fortunes on the lucrative real estate sector, creating a 350 million development, Sigona Valley, an exclusive gated community in West Nairobi.

“The young African entrepreneurs, disruptors and innovators featured on this list are impatient to change Africa and together represent the entrepreneurial, innovative and intellectual best of their generation,” said Mr. Mfonobong Nsehe a writer at www.forbes.com.

An outside panel of 12 judges from across Africa was picked to help identify the group of outstanding entrepreneurs and innovators under the age of 30, in November last year according to Nsehe.  In each of 15 categories, ranging from technology, real estate to social entrepreneurs, Forbes editors and reporters together with judges choose the field’s brightest stars who are individually most surprising, engaging, and hard working.

Forbes is an American financial standards magazine owned by Forbes, Inc. Published biweekly and headquartered in New York. The magazine reports on related subjects such as technology, communications, science, and law and is well known for its lists, including richest Americans dubbed the Forbes 400, 40 Wealthiest Africans, African top 30 and under 30, highest-paid stars under 30 and its list of billionaires.

“The listing came as a complete surprise to us, when we started we had a dream of getting into real estate we never realised the impact it would have on young people also interested in getting into the industry in Kenya,” said Ian Kahara Director, Serene Valley Properties Limited, the developer of Sigona Valley.

“Being listed in the 30 under 30 innovators and entrepreneurs is a humbling experience that reinforces the need for perseverance, dedication, a clear goal, divine intervention and is a challenge to do more,” said an elated Mr. Kimiti Wanjaria, Director, Serene Valley Properties Limited.

Some of those who have featured in the Forbes list include Kenya's business magnate Chris Kirubi, Uhuru Kenyatta and Sameer Group proprietor Naushad Merali in the top 40 wealthiest Africans list.

Kimiti and Ian both ICT graduates together with 28-year-old quantity surveyor Thomas Koigi, and 37-year-old biochemist Johnson Waweru, proprietors of Serene Valley Properties Limited launched Sigona Valley in March 2012, having raised secure non-bank, development finance from Shelter Afrique to fund their project.

Today, the young developers have made considerable progress at Sigona Valley set for completion in the fourth quarter of 2013.

“We have put together 90 per cent of the project infrastructure, the show house is nearly done and we are halfway in constructing the homes,” Kimiti explained.

Sigona Valley is targeted at the middle-income market segment to an area with significant growth and capital appreciation potential. The development is offering 3 and 4 bedroom villas in three different house designs for between Sh14.5m and Sh19.95m, in a tranquil gated community set on 4 acres, a stone's throw from Waiyaki Way and 5km from Sigona Golf Club.

Each of the 30 homes sit on approximately 1/10th of an acre with access to community facilities such as bore hole water supply, solar hot water heating, waste water recycling and secured boundary walling.

The young developers are also set to launch a new development in the third quarter of 2013.



Developing Countries, Including New Adopters Sudan and Cuba, Now Dominate Use of biotech



By Eric Akasa


For the first time since the introduction of biotech/GM crops almost two decades ago, developing countries have grown more hectares of biotech crops than industrialized countries, contributing to food security and further alleviating poverty in some of the world’s most vulnerable regions.

Developing nations planted 52 percent of the global biotech crops in 2012, up from 50 percent a year earlier and above the 48 percent industrial countries grew last year, according to a report released Wednesday by the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA).

Last year also marked an unprecedented 100-fold increase in biotech crop hectarage to 170 million
Hectares from 1.7 million in 1996, when biotech crops were first commercialized. “This makes biotech
Crops the fastest adopted crop technology in recent history,” said Clive James, veteran author of the
annual report and chair and founder of ISAAA.

Adoption of biotech crops in developing countries has built up steadily over the years, finally turning the
Corner and surpassing industrial countries in 2012, a milestone once thought impossible by some, James
Observes. This comes about as the world grows more biotech crops than ever before.

“This growth is contrary to the prediction of critics, who prior to the commercialization of the technology
in 1996 prematurely declared that biotech crops were only for industrial countries, and would never be
accepted and adopted by developing countries,” James points out.

The report underscores rising awareness in developing countries about the benefits of planting genetically
modified crops, which not only have increased yields, but also bring savings in fuel, time and machinery,
reduction in pesticide use, higher quality of product and more growing cycles.

From 1996 to 2011, biotech crops contributed to food security, sustainability, and climate change by:
increasing crop production valued at US$98.2 billion; providing a better environment by saving 473
million kg a.i. of pesticides; in 2011 alone reducing CO2 emissions by 23 billion kg, equivalent to taking
10.2 million cars off the road; conserving biodiversity by saving 108.7 million hectares of land; and
helped alleviate poverty by helping >15.0 million small farmers and their families totaling >50 million
people who are some of the poorest people in the world. Biotech crops are essential but are not a panacea
and adherence to good farming practices such as rotations and resistance management, are a must for
biotech crops as they are for conventional crops.

Globally, farmers grew a record 170.3 million hectares of biotech crops in 2012, up 6 percent, or 10.3
million hectares more than in 2011, boosting farmers’ income worldwide due to enhanced productivity
and efficiency gains.

“There is one principal and overwhelming reason that underpins the trust and confidence of farmers in
biotechnology: biotech crops deliver substantial, and sustainable, socio-economic and environmental
benefits,” James said.

Resource-Poor Farmers Benefit the Most
ISAAA’s report also confirmed that the rate and scale of biotech crop adoption in developing countries
dwarfs that of industrialized nations. The growth rate for biotech crops was at least three times as fast, and
five times as large, in developing countries, at 11 percent or 8.7 million hectares, versus 3 percent or 1.6 million hectares in industrial countries.
A record 17.3 million farmers grew biotech crops worldwide in 2012, up 0.6 million from a year earlier.
Over 90 percent of these farmers, or more than 15 million, were small resource-poor farmers in
developing countries. “Global food insecurity, exacerbated by high and unaffordable food prices, is a
formidable challenge to which biotech crops can contribute,” James remarks.
Sudan and Cuba Make History
Sudan and Cuba planted biotech crops for the first time last year. By growing biotech cotton, Sudan
became the fourth country in Africa, after South Africa, Burkina Faso and Egypt, to commercialize a
biotech crop.
Meanwhile, Cuban farmers planted 3,000 hectares of hybrid biotech maize as part of an initiative to
bolster ecological sustainability and remain pesticide free.
Of the 28 countries that planted biotech crops, 20 were developing and eight were industrial countries,
compared to 19 developing and 10 industrial countries in 2011. Approximately 60 percent of the world’s
population, or about 4 billion people, live in the 28 countries planting biotech crops.

China, India, Brazil, Argentina and South Africa, which together represent approximately 40 percent of
the global population, grew 78.2 million hectares or 46 percent of global biotech crops in 2012.
For the fourth consecutive year, Brazil was the engine of growth globally in 2012, fortifying itself as a
global leader in biotech crops. Brazil ranks second only to the U.S. in worldwide biotech crop hectarage,
growing at a year-to-year record 6.3 million hectares, or a substantial 21 percent, to reach 36.6 million
hectares in 2012 compared to 30.3 million in 2011.
A fast-track science-based approval system allows Brazil to adopt new biotech crops in a timely manner.
For instance, the South American country was the first to approve the stacked soybean with insect
resistance and herbicide tolerance for commercialization in 2013, James said.
India cultivated a record 10.8 million hectares of biotech cotton with an adoption rate of 93 percent, while
7.2 million small resource-poor farmers in China grew 4.0 million hectares of biotech cotton with an
adoption rate of 80 percent.

U.S. Remains the World’s Largest Grower
The U.S. continued to be the lead country with 69.5 million hectares, with an average of 90 percent
adoption across all crops. The report notes that the devastating 2012 drought hit various crops. The most
recent estimates indicate that due to the drought, average yields in 2012 were 21 percent less for maize
and 12 percent less for soybeans compared with 2011 yields.
Canada, on the other hand, had a record 8.4 million hectares of canola at a record 97.5 percent adoption.
The EU countries grew a record 129,071 hectares of Bt maize in 2012, but Germany and Sweden could
not continue to plant the biotech potato Amflora because it ceased to be marketed; Poland discontinued
planting biotech maize because of regulation inconsistencies in the interpretation of the law with the EU
maintaining that all necessary approvals were already in place for planting, whereas Poland did not.
Challenges Remain
The lack of appropriate, science-based and cost-time-effective regulatory systems continues to be the
major constraint to adoption of biotech crops. Responsible, rigorous but not onerous, regulation is needed
for small and poor developing countries, James said.
“Biotech crops are important but are not a panacea,” he added. “Adherence to good farming practices,
such as rotations and resistance management, are a must for biotech crops as they are for conventional
crops.”
The near-term looks encouraging with new improved products such as the first biotech drought tolerant
maize approved for planting in the USA in 2013 and also the first planting of the stacked soybean in
Brazil and neighboring countries in South America in 2013. In the Philippines, Vitamin A enhanced
Golden rice could be released in 2013/2014 subject to regulatory approval. Going forward, global growth
of biotech crop hectares is likely to be more modest due to the already high rate of adoption in all the
principal crops in mature markets in both developing and industrial countries, James noted.

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

New Report Warns US Budget Cuts Could Jeopardize Decades of Work to Develop Life-saving Tools against Major Killers Including AIDS, TB and Malaria

By Eric Akasa


Across-the-board cuts to US R&D programs could have a devastating impact on efforts to develop new drugs for tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/AIDS, the world’s first malaria vaccine, and other vital global health products in development, according to a new report from a coalition of nonprofit groups focused on advancing innovation to save lives.

“We know that policymakers are currently facing difficult budget decisions. But any reductions in funds could eliminate essential support for the development of global health tools and slow or halt the progress made against addressing a number of deadly diseases,” said Kaitlin Christenson, MPH, director of the Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC). 

The report from the GHTC, Renewing US leadership: Policies to advance global health research, comes as Washington is bracing for a “budget sequestration” process that, according to some estimates, could cut 5.2 percent from programs across government, including initiatives that have put hundreds of new drugs, vaccines, diagnostics and other disease-fighting tools into the product pipeline and established the US as the world’s leader in developing life-saving global health technology.

The analysis finds the cuts to global health R&D “would barely make a dent in reducing the US federal deficit but would have a crippling impact on people’s health and lives around the world.”

“There is much to lose by pulling back now,” the report states.
Some estimates predict that under sequestration, global health initiatives at the State Department and US Agency for International Development (USAID) could lose $482 million, money that supports, among other things, the development of new drugs to quell an alarming resurgence in deadly TB and new tools to escalate the fight against HIV/AIDS. Meanwhile, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is supporting a new dengue vaccine candidate, new HIV prevention methods, and potential new treatments for TB, could lose nearly $2 billion.
In addition, the sequestration process would result in steep losses for R&D programs funded by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Department of Defense (DoD). Taken together, the cuts throughout the government could jeopardize any number of the 200 global health products that have advanced in the research pipeline thanks to US support. Conversely, the GHTC finds that “continued and consistent US investment in R&D…will provide the momentum needed to push promising new tools over the finish line.” 

“Today, all across the US government we see solutions emerging to global health problems we’ve been fighting for decades, or, in some cases, centuries,” said Steve Davis, President and CEO of PATH. “The DoD is helping advance a promising AIDS vaccine candidate. The FDA is spurring the development of new drugs and vaccines for TB. NIH is helping to put us ever closer to a malaria vaccine. The CDC is coming up with a new test for detecting dengue virus, which is critical to monitoring its rapid spread. And USAID is providing essential support for new reproductive health technologies.”
“US taxpayers are rightly demanding results from federal expenditures,” Davis added, “and the wise investments our government has made in global health R&D are clearly providing excellent returns.”
The GHTC report notes that US investments in global health R&D have helped deliver “some of the greatest advances” the field has ever experienced. Recent achievements include a new, highly effective Africa-specific vaccine for meningitis A; a new rapid test for detecting TB; and the world’s first malaria drug for children.

 The GHTC also finds that global health expenditures, which include support for product development partnerships (PDPs) with the private sector, are helping boost the nation’s economic performance. The report cites evidence that “64 cents of every dollar spent by the US government on global health R&D goes directly to US-based researchers and product developers.”
Moreover, the drugs, vaccines and diagnostics so crucial to saving lives in countries with high burdens of infectious diseases are increasingly needed to protect public health on the home front.
For example, just this past summer, Florida experienced its largest TB outbreak in 20 years. Dengue fever has now persisted on the US mainland long enough that it may have developed its own unique US strain. And Chagas, a disease carried by so-called “kissing bugs” that can cause serious heart and digestive problems, is now migrating northward from Latin America. Up to one million cases have been found in the US, with the disease burden believed to be particularly high along the Gulf Coast.
The GHTC report observes that “there are an estimated five million impoverished Americans who live with neglected tropical diseases—including a previously hidden burden of neglected diseases among the poor in the southern United States.”
The GHTC asserts that, ultimately, if “the damaging effects of sequestration do take place, agencies must do their best to protect product development priorities within their budgets.”
“Even in these difficult fiscal times, US policymakers must persist in their support for global health research,” the report states.
The GHTC report finds that the threat of cuts via sequestration is part of a broader and troubling trend that has seen US support for global health decline over the past few years.
For example, the latest Global Funding of Innovation for Neglected Diseases (G-FINDER) survey documented a $30 million drop in 2011 in US support for global health-related research and product development. GHTC worries that the US is drifting in a way that could “put the nation’s legacy as a scientific and humanitarian leader at risk.”
The report points out that the sequestration debate is occurring at the same time lawmakers are debating funding levels for the rest of this year and for 2014—a separate discussion, but one that also has significant implications for global health research. GHTC views the 2013 and 2014 appropriations process as an opportunity for the US decision makers to step back and re-examine budget priorities and “reverse the trend of decreased global health and R&D funding seen in recent years.”
According to the GHTC, “There could not be a better time for the United States to renew its global health R&D legacy.”
Also, given that budget pressures will demand better performance from government-funded endeavors, the GHTC is calling for a new “five-year strategy” that coordinates global health research and product development across the federal government. The GHTC envisions a strategy that, among other things, clarifies priorities and provides “metrics to measure success.” The GHTC believes work should begin now with the goal of completing the strategy by December 2014.



Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Pan-African News Post: East African Portland Cement Company’s Pretax Prof...

Pan-African News Post: East African Portland Cement Company’s Pretax Prof...: By Eric Akasa From left EAPCC MD Kephar Tande, Industrialisation, PS Cyrus Njiru (centre) and the company's chairman Mark Ole K...

East African Portland Cement Company’s Pretax Profit Up 253% to Hit Sh377 million



By Eric Akasa
From left EAPCC MD Kephar Tande, Industrialisation, PS Cyrus Njiru (centre) and the company's chairman Mark Ole Karbolo peruse the results after the company announced a Sh377m pretax profit yesterday.

East African Portland Cement Company Monday announced a return to profitability , recording Sh377 million profit before tax for the six months ending December 31, 2012, up from a loss of Sh247 million the same period last year. The profit was realized from a Sh624 million turnaround in earnings, which represents an impressive growth of 253%.
While turnover dropped by 8% from Sh4.95 billions in 2011 to Sh4.54billions in the current period, gross profit margins increased to 30% from 18% previously on the back of cost-cutting, cost-management and forex gains.
According to Kephar Tande Managing Director East African Portland cement company, major improvements in production efficiencies resulted in savings of over Sh850m.  He said the drop in revenue was due to extended recovery of market share into the first quarter of the current financial year, following challenges experienced last year.
“Costs were well contained through stringent cost management and implementation of a new strategic plan,” said Tande at a media briefing. “Finance costs were impacted positively by the improved lending rates on the domestic market and this trend may continue toward the end of the current financial year.” He adds.
Earnings were also bolstered by a forex gain of Sh145m on its Yen-denominated loan, up from Sh74 million in the comparable period last year, as the shilling strengthened against the Yen.
Mr. Tande said the company had recovered its market share from 19% in July last year to the current 21% and targets to hit its pre-crisis level of 25% by the end of the current financial year. This will be achieved through increased marketing and distribution network as well as a push into new markets in Uganda and South Sudan.
He announced that EAPCC would enter the Tanzanian market in the second half after the country removed non-tariff barriers to trade. He added that the company is implementing a five-year strategic plan (2013-2016), which includes upgrading its kiln to boost production by 150,000 tonnes per annum, a new packaging line to improve turnaround of trucks, acquiring more reserves in Kitui and Kajiado as well as purchasing a new clinker and construction of a new grinding mill. This is expected to boost its market to 37% by 2016.
“Despite the growing competition,” he said, “there are opportunities for growth to meet the increasing local and regional demand for cement.”
The company exports 5% of its production annually and expects to boost that to 10% by 2014.
Chairman Mark Ole Karbolo said the company had put its problems behind and the new management’s strategy had begun to bear fruit.