Nokia Announces latest Asha 205

By Eric Akasa

 Nokia has announced that the Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM, is now available for purchase in East Africa. Nokia’s most affordable QWERTY phone is the newest addition to the Asha range and is the only Nokia device to feature a dedicated Facebook button, making it perfect for highly social consumers who want the fastest access to their Facebook profile. Combined with eBuddy Chat, Twitter and support for popular email accounts such as Gmail, the Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM is designed to ensure that people are never more than a few clicks away from their social networks.

This latest addition to the Asha range is available in a range of eye-catching colours such as Orange, Cyan and Magenta* at selected retail outlets across Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Estimated retail prices: Kenya – KSH 5, 499, Uganda – UGX 215,000, and Tanzania – TSH 120,000

The Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM is also one of the first devices to feature Nokia’s exclusive Slam feature. Slam allows consumers to share multimedia content like photos and videos with nearby friends almost instantly. Slam works with most Bluetooth-enabled mobile phones without the need to pair devices, and without the recipient needing to also have Slam. In just a few clicks, people can ‘Slam’ their content to another device faster than with Bluetooth alone and without consuming Internet data.

“The Nokia Asha 205 with QWERTY keyboard and dedicated Facebook button is perfect for the vibrant youth market in East Africa,” says Bruce Howe, General Manager for Nokia East Africa. “Recent reports from Social Bakers indicate that there are now almost 3.3 Million Facebook users in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania, and the majority of these are between the ages of 18-24. In Kenya alone, Facebook users grew by over 30% in the last 6 months, highlighting the importance of making Facebook access seamless”.Other key features of the Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM include: eBuddy screen notifications that keep users up-to-the-minute on new conversations, a comprehensive mobile entertainment package, including 40 free EA Games available for download, along with tens of thousands of other apps available from the Nokia Store, Nokia’s exclusive Easy Swap technology that enables consumers to change SIM cards without having to turn off the device, the Nokia Asha 205 Dual SIM phone remembers the settings of up to five SIM cards making it easy to switch between making calls or using the Internet, and great standby time: up to 25 days

The new device takes full advantage of the Nokia Xpress Internet platform, which uses Nokia's cloud technology to reduce data consumption by up to 90%, helping consumers enjoy more affordable Internet access. It also features Nokia Nearby, a web app that helps consumers discover points of interest such as restaurants, shopping and ATM close to their location.

Discrimination Against Rift Valley IDP’s

By Eric Akasa

The Kenyan government has discriminated based on ethnicity in assisting displaced people from the Rift Valley, Human Rights Watch said today. The discriminatory practices are stoking inter-ethnic tensions ahead of the March 2013 elections.

Human Rights Watch research in Kenya’s Central Rift’s Nakuru county and North Rift’s Uasin Gishu county in late 2012 revealed significantly preferential treatment for internally displaced persons (IDPs) from the Kikuyu community of President Mwai Kibaki over other displaced people in the two counties. The authorities have not provided satisfactory justification for the differential treatment.

An estimated 400,000 people of various communities in the Rift Valley were displaced by inter-ethnic clashes after the last general elections in 2007. Local government officials, as well as community leaders and civil society activists, fear the government’s policies have increased the chance for another round of election-related violence.

“The government is favoring one community over others in the allocation of homes, land, and money for displaced people and this is causing anger and frustration in the Rift Valley,” said Leslie Lefkow, deputy Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “These policies have exacerbated tensions in an area that is still recovering from serious election-related violence five years ago, and the tensions could lead to violence again.”

Kenya is due to hold general elections on March 4. In Nakuru County the most intense competition is between candidates from the Kikuyu community and those from the other large local community, the Kalenjin. Uasin Gishu County is predominantly Kalenjin with a significant Kikuyu population.

Violence in the central and northern Rift Valley between members of the Kikuyu and Kalenjin communities formed a significant part of the nationwide upheaval after the December 2007 elections, resulting in killings, rapes, and the forced displacement of about 650,000 people from all communities countrywide. The violence led to indictments of people from both communities by the International Criminal Court, including two former cabinet ministers ­– Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto ­– who are now running together for president and deputy president.

In late 2012 Human Rights Watch spent one week in Nakuru county and one week in Uasin Gishu county speaking with local government officials, police, tribal elders, civic groups, and community members from the Kikuyu and Kalenjin, as well as other local communities. The prevailing view of interviewees in both counties, including government officials, was that the national government has been favoring displaced Kikuyu at the expense of other communities.

The discrimination in Nakuru and Uasin Gishu counties takes two general forms, Human Rights Watch said. First, the government has given priority to displaced Kikuyu when rebuilding homes and providing new homes, land, or money. Some Kikuyu families have received more than one new home.

Second, the vast majority of Kalenjin displaced in the 2007-2008 violence, roughly 300,000 people across Kenya, have not been officially registered by the Ministry for Special Programmes, which has responsibility for internally displaced people, or received any government support, Human Rights Watch research indicates.

The government says it is providing equal assistance to internally displaced people from all communities, but it refuses to collect data on the ethnic breakdown of people who have received government assistance. Collecting that data is essential to ensure that the government treats all communities in a non-discriminatory manner, Human Rights Watch said.

Government officials contend that it is difficult to identify displaced Kalenjin because most of them chose to stay with relatives rather than go to camps. They say these so-called “integrated IDPs” are difficult to locate and therefore register and assist.

“The government could have done much more to register and assist the displaced people who are staying with families ­– the so-called ‘integrated IDPs’,” Lefkow said. “The claim that they are difficult to find masks the government’s unwillingness to provide assistance fairly to all Kenyans.”

The United Nations special rapporteur on internally displaced people, citing the “de facto exclusion” of roughly 314,000 “integrated IDPs” from any “assistance, protection or durable solutions,”called on Kenya in February 2012 to develop “accurate, efficient and disaggregated data-collection and database/registration systems which are comprehensive and inclusive of all categories of IDPs.”

Government officials in Nakuru and Uasin Gishu confirmed for Human Rights Watch that the national government was favoring displaced Kikuyus, and some said they had advised against the practice.

A senior official in the Ministry of Internal Security told Human Rights Watch that the Ministry for Special Programmes had ignored repeated warnings about the dangers of its discriminatory policies.

“There seems to be resistance to any suggestion that this kind of bias should be changed,” the security official said.

An official at the Ministry for Special Programmes was more direct: “The entire government machinery is Kikuyu and this machinery is favoring the Kikuyu on the ground,” he said.

Discrimination based on race or ethnic origin in access to rights is strictly prohibited under international human rights law. The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has stated that, “Differential treatment based on prohibited grounds will be viewed as discriminatory unless the justification for differentiation is reasonable and objective.”

The Kenyan constitution prohibits direct or indirect discrimination against anyone on any grounds, including ethnic or social origin, and requires law and other measures to be put in place to ensure equality.

A new law for IDPs, the Internally Displaced Persons Act, and a new national policy for IDPs, which both came into effect in late 2012, can help with IDP protection and assistance and should be implemented by the government, Human Rights Watch said.

Kenya should also sign and ratify the African Union Convention for the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons in Africa (Kampala Convention), which, among other protections, forbids discrimination in the treatment of internally displaced people, Human Rights Watch said. Thirty-seven of Africa’s 53 states have signed the convention and 16 states have ratified it.

The government’s failure to arrest and prosecute those responsible for the 2007-2008 election-related violence has heightened tensions by leaving the people responsible for past violence free to repeat their actions, Human Rights Watch said. Only three people have been convicted for the arson, killings, and rapes from that time ­– all of them Kalenjin from the Rift Valley. One of the men was acquitted on appeal.

“After the terrible violence around the last elections the government had an opportunity to make landmark changes in Kenyan politics,” Lefkow said. “Sadly, it has failed to take those steps and serve all communities fairly.”